So WHA believes that the “greatest” poet were irresponsible,
there is no contrast so first clause should support the second
the possesion of great gifts
couldn’t use copy paste
possession of great gifts _ the likeliness to abuse them (A,C,D,E) all have that
then A) negates - no
possession of great gifts increases the likeliness to abuse them - that explains irresponsibility
So chose c
yeah, C continues the same idea
1 Like