GRE don’t understand question
Ironically, the party leaders encountered no greater ------- their efforts to build a progressive party than the ------- of the progressives already elected to the legislature. (A) support for. .advocacy (B) threat to … promise (C) benefit from … success (D) obstacle to … resistance (E) praise for … reputation
Correct ans: D
I struggled between option A & D
My interpretation is:
Ironically —> Overall the 2 ideas are contrasting
Party leaders building progressive party: _____
NO GREATER THAN Progressives already elected to the legislature build progressive party: _______
So 2 blanks must be the same vocab, and that shows “Ironic relationship”
If I say Party leaders build progressive party RECEIVE NO GREATER SUPPORT than ADVOCACY of progressives already elected in legislature —> We expect party leaders to gain more support —> but end up the same as the existing Progressives members —> Therefore “ironically”—> Sounds make sense
If I say Party leaders build progressive party RECEIVE NO GREATER OBSTACLE than RESISTANCE progressives already elected in legislature —> We expect party leaders to receive more resistance —> but end up the same as the existing Progressives members —>Therefore “ironically” —> Also makes sense
- That his intransigence in making decisions ________ no open disagreement from any quarter was well known; thus, clever subordinates learned the art of ________ their opinions in casual remarks.
(A) elicited… quashing
(B) engendered… recasting
(C) brooked… intimating
(D) embodied… instigating
(E) forbore… emending
Correct ans: C
I struggled between option A & C
(A) elicited —> showcase a cause and effect relationship
Because intransigence in making decisions —> THEREFORE —> no open disagreement
For the 2nd vocab, I think both (A) quashing & (C) intimating are ok in the context. So why option (C) ?