Need help in this question, here Greg went like this- He use the time-contrast strategy, wherein he focussed on initially agreed and concluded that as we moved forward in time he was less and less flexible i.e rigid on a settlement. Post which he told that the actual is here acting as now and then he selected option c
But can’t the answer be option e as when we plug it in, it makes sense that the act of initially agreeing and then going back is an act of cowardice
