Hi! Doubt in this TC question:
- I wanted to confirm, that Greg is using the “extreme word” strategy here right? I had earlier predicted a negative word in the blank, something like “not important” given the logic of the sentence.
- Also, why is reaffirmation wrong here? Just trying to understand why we eliminated it (right now, not factoring in whether its pair fits or not); reaffirming the validity of old contributions is a positive thing, and therefore I had not eliminated it.
In such cases, how can I choose between a negative word vs. an extreme word, if logic for both seems fitting- as it does atleast in my understanding in this case
