I got 3 incorrect and 2 were left unanswered as seen in the above images, how is it possible to get 168/170 in quant then?
According to me the score should be atleast <165 in this case.
Kindly help me with this.
I got 3 incorrect and 2 were left unanswered as seen in the above images, how is it possible to get 168/170 in quant then?
According to me the score should be atleast <165 in this case.
Kindly help me with this.
@Kweku would you be able to help me figure this out.
Gregmat Practice Tests are notoriously harder (though that is debatable) than ets PTs. As such, the scores are adjusted/scaled accordingly - The score curve can sometimes seem incongruous with ets’.
The best indicators of your score or level are the ets tests, especially the paid ones (Greg will be the first person to tell you this). Therefore, treat Greg tests as a way to build a stronger foundation, practice some more questions (given how limited ets test materials are) and generally have fun under timed exam conditions. Focus on your performance and not the score.
A few other points to note:
By the way, congrats on such an incredible performance.
Wishing you hit your score goals on the real thing.
As said by you, I shall focus on performance rather than questioning and gauging my preparation on just the basis of the score.
Also, I will make sure to attempt every question even though I might have to guess a few of them.
Thank you so much for your advice, it means a lot to me.