Confused in the logic of this question:
My logic for predicting the blank: Since investors ignored mismanagement, they concluded that new cash will NOT have a negative effect on finances- thus I choice fleeting, momentary - that was negative vs. complete/ total- the other SE pair.
My question: The explanation given in the text seems to be opposite of what I understood- where fleeting/ momentary is viewed as negative; and not an outcomes of the “NOT negative” logic. Basically, is my understanding of the logic here, and the meaning of “anything more than” okay?
Would be great if you could help me understand this. This is slightly convulated, I hope I was able to ask my question properly.