Can someone help with breaking down the different logic arguments in the answer choices? My logic breakdown is below, would appreciate feedback on where I might have gone wrong.
Let’s say
P: subject of the under image of painting appears in other authentic paintings
Q: painting is authentic
Answer B: in most cases, Q contains P.
Answer C: if not Q, then not P
Since the logic of answer C does not guarantee that if P, then Q, I went with answer B. B also was more topical and less universal.
B is a wonderful trap laid by ETS. See the question demands us to answer in absolute due to the must present in it.
I see, thank you very much!!
I think Greg mentioned the same thing when he solved this in his CR dedicated series(can’t exactly remember the session number) .https://new.gregmat.com/course/dedicated-critical-reasoning
Thanks, I just watched and it was at the end of session 4. Always demoralizing to spend so long agonizing over something Greg picks up so quickly.
One of the perks of being a GRE tutor I guess
