Is there a problem solving strategy to be used when faced with (seemingly) illogical options ? Here, (i) should be fungible. But there is nothing really to indicate this at all, nothing that would suggest the drivers should be " being something (such as money or a commodity) of such a nature that one part or quantity may be replaced by another equal part or quantity in paying a debt or settling an account ".
Here, " debatable " and " moot " are the answers. I can see how " debatable " works due to the word " disagree ". Moot, defined as " to suggest something for discussion / often discussed or argued about but having no definite answer / not important or not relevant, therefore not worth discussing " does not seem substitutable at all. " absurd " and " ridiculous " made more sense, but it of an inappropriate intensity. In sentence completion and fill in the blanks for the verbal, there are mechanics you can glean, such as intensity of wording, contrast markers, or identify what the word is meant to refer to to narrow down appropriate options. What recourse is there when that kind of mechanic breaks down ? To me, the possible options all seem so bad that I can’t discriminate what is the least worst.
