The question explicitly asks for the second smallest value of n. It also says n is a positive integer.
The answer assumes the smallest value of n is zero, to arrive at option B, but zero is not a positive integer therefore it cannot be n.
Right?
The question explicitly asks for the second smallest value of n. It also says n is a positive integer.
The answer assumes the smallest value of n is zero, to arrive at option B, but zero is not a positive integer therefore it cannot be n.
Right?
What is the entire question?
The smallest value of n is 3, not 0?
When 3 is divided by 7, the remainder is also 3.
So the smallest value of n is 3.
Next smallest value being 10.
Thus, 17 is greater.
