The correct answer here is specific. However, why can’t we say that provisions were controversial since it “made the king subject to the law”
If you use the math strategy here you can see that “but” gives us a contrast between
“not in its ____” and “Broader impact”.
So the blank has to be a contrast of “broader impact”.
We don’t really need the second half of the sentence to solve for this blank.
There is no evidence in the sentence that supports “Controversial” as an answer choice.
This is exactly what Greg said in the video. However, I am asking why we do not need to use it when I can see that making the King subject to the Law can be a controversial thing
Because these questions are not subjective and you need to find the logic. Could you answer why you would eliminate Specific?
The fact that you think that its controversial is quite subjective. I don’t see a problem in why the King Should not come under the law, for instance.
1 Like
Don’t take in a hard way but we donot have enough evidence of king, it may be of america, canada… And king subject to law. This view may be taken differently by different people, it may be good thing to people, bad thing to his son, it may be apple banana whatever it can be but we don’t have any evidence of it being apple or banana. Thus, that information is insufficient to tackle blank.
Just besides the blank we have word broad and in any of the dictionary in world it’s meaning is same thus due to proximity it has to be contrasted with broad
As greg suggest we must be binary or else we fall into ETS trap
Thanks guys for your valuable inputs. Understood now.