I was going through Greg’s test 4 TC walkthrough and for this question he chose “unbiased” for blank 1 and “flawed” for blank 2. Isn’t this using outside knowledge that scientists are “unbiased”?
I don’t understand how we can conclude “unbiased” and “flawed” by taking evidence from the question itself.
My thought process for this question was:
Blank 1:
“Though” indicates contrast so the phrase “scientists are no different from anyone else” and “science is imagined as a ___ exploration of external reality” should contrast each other. Since “scientists are no different from anyone else”, that means they are same as others so I put “different” (opp of same) in the first blank.
Blank 2:
“:” indicates support so the phrase before “:” must support the phrase after the semi colon. Idea before the semi colon says scientists are same as other people so I put “same as other” in the second blank.