Critical reasoning problem

When the manufacturer of Voltage, a major soft drink, changed its secret formula last year, the export earnings of an island in the Indian Ocean began to fall. This island’s only export comprises more than half of the world’s supply of vanilla beans. Analysts concluded that the original formula of Voltage contained vanilla from beans, but the new formula did not.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion drawn by the analysts?

(A) The vanilla-bean plantings of a nearby island were beginning to produce crops.

(B) A new process for synthesizing vanilla was under development in a laboratory in the United States.

© The island’s trade agreement, under which the vanilla beans were exported to the country that manufactures Voltage, had lapsed.

(D) Imports of vanilla beans dropped in countries where Voltage is made.

(E) There were decreases in sales of several widely sold products that were known to contain vanilla.

I would say D.
But I’m curious to know what others think.

Finding out if there is a correlation between the import of vanilla at production and decreased earnings at the growers would signify the change in the formula being the reason for decreased earnings, rather than something else.

I also said D. Mostly because when you see enough of these questions you know that ETS is trying to screw you over with C and D being so alike, and none of the other answers address the information in the passage…

I omitted C definitively because it reverses the timeline.
Passage says: Formula changes, then exports drop.
Answer C says: Exports drop, then formula changes.

I’m sure there’s a more logical explanation for why it’s D, but process of elimination is my best friend