So for the second blank, we do not know whether or not caffeine is bad for health right, so we technically do not have evidence about glut being the right answer and so i had chosen dose.
Is there any evidence that glut should be the answer?
So for the second blank, we do not know whether or not caffeine is bad for health right, so we technically do not have evidence about glut being the right answer and so i had chosen dose.
“; true the drink does contain a ___ of caffeine but…”
There is a contrast here with the preceding idea. Since the preceding idea talked about something that is beneficial, this idea must talk about something that isn’t.
We can conclude that caffeine is not beneficial
But we dont know how bad caffeine is right, maybe a small amount could be bad or a large amount could be bad
The blank about caffeine shows clear contrast with the following sentence about coffee having benefits regardless. Conclusion caffeine= not good
1 Like