As per the explanation given by Greg , in "Poe’s _______ reviews " , the ideas must be positive basis the idea suggested by “great merit” . However, the phrase starting from “which” is a non-essential modifier, and if we ignore that modifier for a moment, the sentence reads " Poe’s _____ reviews ----- must make us respect his CRITICAL judgement ------- literary talent. "
Here, "must make ------ " supports "Poe’s ____ reviews " .
so, as per the logic, if the judgements are CRITICAL (-ve) , shall the reviews of Poe not be critical (-ve) too ?
Kindly assist. Thanks
I will tackle it like this:
- “… which often find great merit in otherwise (ii) _____ literary gems”:
This part provide additional information about Poe’s reviews. It says that Poe’s reviews often recognize “great merit” in certain “literary gems.” The use of “otherwise” suggests that these literary pieces might not be typically recognized as gems (or of high quality) by others.
- “… must make us respect his critical judgment in addition to his well-known literary talent”:
This portion tells us that Poe’s reviews should increase our respect for his “critical judgment.”
Now, let guess the words given the context:
Given that Poe’s reviews often find “great merit” in pieces that others might not see as valuable, the reviews would be more likely positive, praising, or appreciative rather than negative. So, for blank (i), a word like “insightful,” “astute,” or “perceptive” would be fitting.
For blank (ii), since these “literary gems” are described as “otherwise” having a certain characteristic, it suggests that in general opinion, they might not be seen as valuable. So, a word like “overlooked,” or “unappreciated” are an apt guesses.
The word “critical” in “critical judgment” can be somewhat misleading here. “Critical” in this context means “pertaining to criticism or careful judgment,” not necessarily negative. So, it is saying we must respect his ability to judge literature carefully and insight-fully.
thanks so much. clear now