The answer is A and E. But I believe in order for those to be answers, there should be an evidence that generally it is assumed that two movements are hostile, and the activist’s work is undermining it. I chose B and F, thinking that because the activist’s is working hard on both movements, they are predominant. Please help me understand the answer and evidence for that.
Double possibility : The key words is the assertion → We can either support it or not support it .
- Now, if we chose support in the blank (i) then blank (ii) must be related.
- Or , if we chose not support in blank(i) then blank(ii) must be hostile .
Now , we look at the options and find that only choice 2 is available to us.
Thus, the answers are A and E.
1 Like
I’m not sure but I think
The 2 blanks support each other
So this is a double possibility question
With (1) support (2) same movement
Or
(1) undermine (2) opposite movement
So I went to blank 2 and found inimical as a better option (I thought predominant would work but it means important or priority and stuff)
So inimical or harm or opposed would fit better and
based on that I chose undermine for the first blank.
So the answer is undermine/inimical
Even I did the same way -
undermine - not related
support - related
so I knew form looking at the options that undermine-not related would be the right pair but couldn’t choose the proper word for not related. How did you come up with “same - opposite movement”?