Hi guys, I’m wondering what kinds of negative emaples should I give if the prompt is something like the following:
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
If I I think governments should spend more money on public transportation, do my negative examples have to be related to the downside of Internet access, or just simply the disadvatages of the lack of transportation?
Thanks in advance!
More in the terms like these:
Improving public transportation is more important than improving Internet access because it is a basic necessity for many people. Without reliable transportation, it can be difficult for individuals to get to work, school, or access essential services.
Investing in public transportation can also have long-term economic benefits. For example, better transportation infrastructure can attract businesses and tourists, which can boost the local economy.
In contrast, not everyone needs or uses the Internet on a regular basis. For example, older individuals or those living in rural areas may not see the value in having access to the Internet.
Additionally, improving public transportation can have environmental benefits. For example, investing in public transportation can reduce traffic congestion and air pollution, which can have positive effects on public health.
Finally, improving public transportation can also promote social inclusion. For example, by providing accessible and affordable transportation options, governments can help ensure that all members of the community can participate in society, regardless of their income or abilities.
Got it, thank you so much!!