I’ve been watching Greg’s video’s on signals and supporting and contrasting. Just to clarify, just because there are two blanks there doesn’t have to be two signals? For some questions I see - there are two blanks and he refers to two signals ‘While Parker is very outspoken…’ (TC and SE 2) and there was a While (contrasting signal) and then a semi colon (support signal). But then ‘Hampshire’s assertions…’ he used the far from (contrasting signal) to contrast blank 1 and blank 2.
'In spite of the fact the scientist’s meticulously documented research could be ___, some people ___. So there is a could be (support word) and an in spite (contrast word).
How do I know that the ‘in spite’ applies to the second blank and the ‘could be’ applies to the first blank?
Unfortunately, I took this example from one of Greg’s videos (so I remember which support/contrast corresponds to which blank). I believe blank 1 is a positive word as it belongs to ‘could be’ which is a support word for idea 1 meticulously documented research. Meaning blank 1 could be published or disseminated. But the ‘in spite’ belongs to blank 2 (which is a contrast word) and it is being contrasted against meticulously documented research. Therefore blank 2 would be negative meaning the research could be ignored or rejected.