Hello Greg and everyone!
I have been thinking about this for months or even years, but finally decided to ask you, Greg. I have been following only your recommendation since the beginning of my GRE journey because it works. Therefore, the purpose of this post is to question the points that might be crucial to be considered. If this question has been answered before, please kindly share the title post/link. The questions are related to the (third-party) materials.
-
Why do you allow/recommend us to read the third-party news material (The Economist, etc.), but recommend avoiding test-prep companies material (Kaplan, Magoosh, etc.). In the context of reading passages (not the questions), isn’t a test-prep company logically more relevant than a media company?
-
You always recommend focusing on the ETS material. Why do you still recommend Manhattan 5lb for quant practice (not Kaplan, etc.), some materials are irrelevant because of the question format/difficulty. If I am not mistaken, Manhattan and Kaplan are owned by the same company, and based on what I notice, they segment their materials (difficulty) so it does not overlap. We can notice that Kaplan is easier than Manhattan IMO. Please CMIIW.
-
Related to question 1 and 2, the former ETS question makers can be hired by those testing companies because test-prep companies have more money than ETS (based on market cap), isn’t it possible that your recommendation might not be relevant at one point of time? Have you tried to disprove your recommendation by researching the big-name test-prep companies recently? I am just wondering. I have not researched myself.
Thank you so much, Greg and everyone.
I hope this post can be an issue/argument essay LOL