The question of (i) _________ in photography has lately become nontrivial. Prices for vintage prints (those made by a photographer soon after he or she made the negative) so drastically (ii) _________ in the 1990s that one of those photographs might fetch a hundred times as much as a nonvintage print of the same image. It was perhaps only a matter of time before someone took advantage of the (iii) ________ to peddle newly created “vintage” prints for profit.
I am confused only with the first blank. I can see the answer is forgery.
According to google, forgery means imitation or copying. Where is the evidence in the text about imitation or copying? Anybody please help me find the evidence.