Smarter solution to Medium Quant Practice P Jan 17,2022

I think I figured out a smarter way to do a problem covered from a lecture: Medium Quant Practice Problem Jan 17, 2022. The question is below:

In a certain competition, there are 8 players. In every stage, each player still in the game has to play every other player still in the game in a head to head match. When a stage is over, half of the players are eliminated from the game. How many head to head matchups are needed until a winner is declared.

Answer choices:

  1. 16
  2. 32
  3. 35
  4. 128
  5. 256

Using combination solves the problem. But if you look carefully at the answer choices, there’s an odd one out, LITERALLY (#3: 35). Since it’s a head to head game, there has to be only 1 game at the last stage.

We know that even+even=even, even+odd=odd, and odd+odd=even (not relevant in this question). We also know that all factorials are even, except 1!

#3 is the correct answer. I thought this approach is simpler and am pretty proud of spotting it. But does this way of thinking have any drawbacks? Are there cases where this wouldn’t work?

OK,

Maybe it’s something to do with the chosen method, but what does factorials have to do here? Your solution is correct when the number of players is a power of 2, and this can be done by deducing that you need an even number of matches to reduce the number of players by half.

Factorials are relevant because the combination formula uses them. I was trying to think of a case where the formula would spit out an odd number