I love PrepSwift. It’s seriously helping me. I just wanted to point out a bit of a decline in the quality of the writing of the quant questions, specifically the word problems. I want to bring it to Greg’s attention, as I feel some sentences are not matching Greg’s standard of excellence that we’re all familiar with and love so dearly. (To clarify, I’m talking about the English in the questions, not anything regarding the math or logic.) @gregmat
I hate to be ‘that guy’, but I feel these are really poorly written and were most definitely not written by Greg. The English is pretty bad and unnatural-sounding, making for a cumbersome read.
Anyway, just wanted to point this out and also say how much I’m loving PrepSwift overall (and GregMat of course). It’s such an amazing resource and I’m super grateful that Greg is giving it for so cheap.
Thanks for the feedback. The person writing them has a brilliant quant mind. Ill start going through the questions tomorrow to clear up any ambiguities. It might take a couple of weeks or so to get through all of them. But I’ll get on it.
In my personal opinion, It’s probably the result of finding the right balance between testing the concept while trying to make it a little bit challenging (plus, fitting in a combination of concept to make it a bit similar to GRE)as the whole concept of PrepSwift is to cover all the GRE topics in least time possible thus, you can’t do layman concept testing as the user will not feel challenged (Think of Khan Academy Questions) and neither can you go all out like Greg’s Full Quant questions as the user might feel that the material has suddenly became too advance.Thus, the author might have a hard time in making such questions but as soon as the feedback mechanism kicks in , the question language will get better!
