SPOILER: PPP+3 : Shall I ignore such specifics in exam? Like energy lost in evaporation is same as solar energy lost in evaporation?

In the first option : It is written energy lost due to evaporation. However, in the last line of the passage, it is mentioned solar energy is lost in evaporation.

I saw many videos online which talks about one word importance. I did not select option A while answering this question basis the rationale that energy word written in option a cannot be assumed to be the solar energy mentioned in the given passage.
However, ETS answer says A is correct.

Shall I ignore such specifics in exam? Like energy lost in evaporation is same as solar energy lost in evaporation?

Please do not ping people like that. You’ve been told not to do that before.

My bad. Removed the tags.

In the option A, ETS is concerned with the amount of energy, and in the passage, it is mentioned as less solar energy.

Energy = Solar energy is not really a concern for this question. ETS could have said heat or heat energy.

Shall I ignore such specifics in exam?
There is no binary answer for this specific question, imo. It almost always depends.

1 Like