Please confirm if the answer to the below question is acerbity ?
I have used previously reference strategy
Incase the answer is wrong, please let me know the right answer and why
Dear Team
As mentioned in the above text,
Please confirm if the answer to the below question is acerbity ?
I have used previously reference strategy
Incase the answer is wrong, please let me know the right answer and why
I linked you to a post on how to write better questions. Read it carefully and update your post accordingly.
Dear Team
What is missing in the question posted ??
For one: you provided no attempt to explain why your answer is acerbity.
I understand why you went with ‘acerbity’ (previously referenced-tying it to words sarcasm and mockery). The principle is ‘meaning overrides strategy’ –> ie, meaning takes precedence over strategy. It does not make sense to say that ‘a very negative quality’ makes a book charming. It looks like there is some other redeeming quality that makes the book charming despite the sarcasm and mockery. Therefore, you need a positive word in the blank that goes well with charm. “Charm” pairs naturally with exoticism (“exotic charm” is an idiom). Profundity (depth of thought) is serious/weighty and doesn’t typically infuse charm; it makes writing thoughtful, not charming. Therefore, exoticism fits that role far better than profundity.
nice answer, but spoonfeeding just encourages laziness.